Developing Employes Psychological Resiliencies In Pandemic Era Through The Role Of Psychological Capital And Adversity Quotient

Authors

  • Elisa Irawati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi AMA Salatiga
  • Yanuar Surya Putra Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi AMA Salatiga
  • Mokhammad Khukaim Barkhowa Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi AMA Salatiga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1234/ichss.v1i1.44

Keywords:

psychological resilience, psychological capital, adversity quotient

Abstract

Psychological resilience is an important concept in the dynamic changes of today's business environment, especially now that the world is facing the Covid - 19    pandemic so that the labor sector is one of the sectors affected. The concept of psychological resilience can be built if individuals in the organization have an adversity quotient. The adversity quotient helps individuals strengthen their abilities and perseverance in facing the challenges of everyday life. In addition to the adversity quotient, to create psychological resilience for employees in today's conditions is by using psychological capital. Besides individual factors, perceived organizational support that represents by supportive and positive organizational climate can improve employees' resiliencies, therefore organizational support in creating psychological resilience for employees affected by covid – 19 is very important. The participants  in this research are employees from manufacturing companies located in Salatiga, who are affected by the covid – 19 pandemic. Data were collected from 152 employees using a self – administered questionnaire. The data analyzed using path analysis, the results of this research shows that psychological capital and adversity quotient do have a positive significant and relationship with employees' psychological resilience. Second, perceived organizational support as a mediating variable, fully mediates the relationship between psychological capital and adversity quotient toward employees' psychological resilience.

References

Alavi, S., & Wahab, D. A. (2013). A review on workforce agility. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.5.4647

Amir, M. T., & Standen, P. (2019). Growth-focused resilience: development and validation of a new scale. Management Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-04-2018-0151

Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070

Çavuş, M., & Gökçen, A. (2015). Psychological Capital: Definition, Components and Effects. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjesbs/2015/12574

Chin, W. W., & Dibbern, J. (2010). An Introduction to a Permutation Based Procedure for Multi-Group PLS Analysis: Results of Tests of Differences on Simulated Data and a Cross Cultural Analysis of the Sourcing of Information System Services Between Germany and the USA. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_8

Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new Resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113

De Meuse, K. P., Dai, G., Swisher, V. V., Eichinger, R. W., & Lombardo, M. M. (2012). Leadership Development: Exploring, Clarifying, and Expanding Our Understanding of Learning Agility. In Industrial and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01445.x

Erdem, H., Turen, U., Gokmen, Y., & Tuz, O. (2017). Perceived organizational support, stress coping behaviors and mediating role of psychological capital: Special education and rehabilitation centers. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business. https://doi.org/10.1515/saeb-2017-0023

Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of Individual-Level Innovation at Work: A Meta-Analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556

Hayes, A. F. (2015). An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683

Krishnan, J., & Mary, V. S. (2012). Percieved Organizational Support - An Overview on Its Antecedents And Consequences. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20140925-15

Lee, J. H., Nam, S. K., Kim, A. R., Kim, B., Lee, M. Y., & Lee, S. M. (2013). Resilience: A meta-analytic approach. Journal of Counseling and Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00095.x

Lock, S., Rees, C. S., & Heritage, B. (2020). Development and validation of a brief measure of psychological resilience: The state–trait assessment of resilience scale. Australian Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12434

Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological Capital: An Evidence-Based Positive Approach. In Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324

Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in Development: A Synthesis of Research across Five Decades. In Developmental Psychopathology: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939406.ch20

Muduli, A. (2016). Exploring the facilitators and mediators of workforce agility: an empirical study. Management Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-10-2015-0236

Nagarajan, R., Patrick, C. F., Tracey, S., & Ron, S. (2005). Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model. Creativity and Innovation Management.

Näswall, K., Malinen, S., Kuntz, J., & Hodliffe, M. (2019). Employee resilience: development and validation of a measure. Journal of Managerial Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2018-0102

Parvathy, D. U., & M, P. (2014). Relationship between Adversity Quotient and Academic Problems among Student Teachers. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-191172326

Pieterse, A. N., van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.650

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698

Roncaglia, I. (2019). Challenges vs opportunities : A different perspective of resilience. Psychreg Journal of Psychology, 3(3), 46–49.

Setiawan, S. N., & Nurwati, N. (2020). Dampak COVID-19 terhadap Tenaga Kerja di Indonesia. Setiawan, Syeikha Nabilla Nurwati, Nunung.

Sheng, Y. K. (2010). Good Urban Governance in Southeast Asia. Environment and Urbanization Asia. https://doi.org/10.1177/097542531000100203

Sherehiy, B., & Karwowski, W. (2014). The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.002

Tüzün, I. K., Çetin, F., & Basim, H. N. (2018). Improving job performance through identification and psychological capital. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2016-0060

Venkatesh, J., & Shivaranjani, G. (2016). Adversity Quotient Profile: A Robust Assessment Tool to Measure Human Resilience. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7315.2016.00219.7

Vinzi, V. E., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS Path Modeling: From Foundations to Recent Developments and Open Issues for Model Assessment and Improvement. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_3

Downloads

Published

25-01-2022

How to Cite

Irawati, E. ., Surya Putra, Y. ., & Khukaim Barkhowa, M. . (2022). Developing Employes Psychological Resiliencies In Pandemic Era Through The Role Of Psychological Capital And Adversity Quotient. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE (ICHSS), 388–395. https://doi.org/10.1234/ichss.v1i1.44